Nolock Vs Read Uncommitted. We have always used either nolock atfer every table or read uncommitted at the top of. Web 10 answers sorted by:
All you NOLOCK lovers better read this!
We have always used either nolock atfer every table or read uncommitted at the top. Web we are seeing some bizarre behavior within one of our stored procs. Web the nolock and readuncommitted table hints are equivalent. Meaning any sql that you execute after that select will be using that isolation. Select * from [ dbo].[. We have always used either nolock atfer every table or read uncommitted at the top of. Only difference is that specifying set transaction isolation level readuncommitted affects. The sql query inside the view, does not have any with (nolock), however, i am using the. Web dirty reads are ok with me, not locking the tables is a priority. One transaction may see uncommitted changes made by some other transaction.
Web friday, april 6, 2012 9:14 am answers 0 sign in to vote hi erik, the nolock table hint is equivalent to the readuncommitted table hint which allows dirty reads. When these table hints are used, dirty reads are allowed. We have always used either nolock atfer every table or read uncommitted at the top of. This essentially does the same as nolock, but instead of doing it on a. 246 this isolation level allows dirty reads. Web dirty reads are ok with me, not locking the tables is a priority. Web readuncommitted and nolock can't be specified for tables modified by insert, update, or delete operations. The sql server query optimizer. Web nolock is equivalent to read uncommitted demonstration i use stackoverflow db for this demo. Web we are seeing some bizarre behavior within one of our stored procs. Web in a nutshell, nolock (read uncommitted) takes no shared locks to prevent other transactions from modifying data read by this transaction.
